63 Comments
User's avatar
Alan, aka DudeInMinnetonka's avatar

I'm 59 and the term Baghdad Bob was known for describing the stereotypical Arab exaggeration Factor including the phony phallustinians who lie when they type / talk but the entire world bought it this time.

Thank you for revealing the truth in this time of lies and derangements.

Expand full comment
Peter Samuel's avatar

FYI @RtS @Reuben Salsa @Tzlil Berko @Roy Ben-Tzvi @Lola šŸ“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ @Darren Grimes @ForeignLocal šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

Just thought you guys might want to know

Expand full comment
ForeignLocal šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø's avatar

Thanks @Peter Samuel

Expand full comment
Serge Milshtein šŸŽ—'s avatar

Thank you! I’d love it if you subscribed!šŸ¤

Expand full comment
ForeignLocal šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø's avatar

Done! Best of luck with your study about the UN. This was shared recently about peacekeepers involved in Human Trafficking. An old story but very new still alas…

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26323303

Expand full comment
Serge Milshtein šŸŽ—'s avatar

Thank you so much! šŸ™šŸ» I have an article about peacekeepers https://open.substack.com/pub/sergemil/p/what-the-un-keeps-silent-about

Expand full comment
Kris Newcomer's avatar

How are they getting 38k children as orphans if only 1K lost both parents? You are not an orphan if you only lose one parent.

Expand full comment
Serge Milshtein šŸŽ—'s avatar

Absolutely! I’d love it if you subscribed!šŸ¤

Expand full comment
ALToronto's avatar

Not only that, the numbers don't add up. Those who lost both parents are already included in the number of those who lost only one. But even if you add up the three numbers, you will get a number smaller than the "total number of orphans".

Expand full comment
Kris Newcomer's avatar

Yes, I don’t understand how they are doing the math. It’s almost like are just making everything up.

Expand full comment
Kris Newcomer's avatar

And these numbers still probably aren’t anywhere close to right given how many natural causes deaths they have tried to sneak into the statistics. But yes, it’s obviously mostly male fighters who were killed. Thanks for exposing this!

Expand full comment
Ban Islam  DJT=Qatar's Bitch's avatar

Good Job Sergei

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

Hey remember that time Moses took 32000 12 year old girls as sex slaves for his army? After he ordered their mothers, fathers and brothers to be slaughtered in front of them. I guess that's part of the rich history Liora and Joanne are referring to maybe. 🤷

Expand full comment
A Stranger in a Strange Land's avatar

Fk u Jew hater

Expand full comment
Leslie U. Harris's avatar

The Gaza Health Ministry has never accounted for deaths from natural causes. Apparently, no one in Gaza dies from diseases or old age.

Expand full comment
Leslie U. Harris's avatar

The Gaza Health Ministry has never distinguished between civilians and combatants. Thanks for parsing this out.

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

The Israelis target the males, both men and children. The idea is that in their minds they will only grow up to be resistors against the occupation.

The other reason is that it's the males that go to get the food aid from stations which are deliberately placed many miles from the refugee camps. Many are shot along the way or arrested for being Palestinian male.

This has been going on for over a decade.

Expand full comment
Joanne Kaufman's avatar

Oh. The Guardian, the quintessential Jew-hating rag. Right.

Expand full comment
Liora Jacob's avatar

Yup. No surprise when Jew haters quote the 21st century versions of Der Sturmer.

Expand full comment
Serge Milshtein šŸŽ—'s avatar

I’d love it if you subscribed!šŸ¤

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

Why are you bringing Jews into the conversation? Let me guess, you're trying to be inflammatory. Correct?

Expand full comment
Liora Jacob's avatar

Oh, should I have said ā€œIsraelisā€?

Because Israel is the reason for two millennia of Jewish persecution and genocide.

Right.

Thanks for proving my point.

Jew haters are too stupid to understand that they make the case for a strong Jewish state better than any Zionist ever could.

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

Yes that is correct. Don't call them Jews, call them Israelis. Judaism is a worldwide religion and there are many Jews in every nation who hate what Netanyahu is doing. Israel is the one committing genocide, subjugation and displacement. By conflating them with Jews you are doing a disservice to Jews worldwide who are innocent in this war. You are inflaming tension against that sector of communities worldwide. Don't.

Expand full comment
David's avatar

At least he's admitted that the Guardian is as impartial as Caitlin Johnstone!!!

Expand full comment
Serge Milshtein šŸŽ—'s avatar

I’d love it if you subscribed!šŸ¤

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

Conveniently ignoring the content without reading it I assume?

Which part of the article isn't true.

Tell me.

Btw it's not just the Guardian that hates Israel, the entire world does now. They've lost any last shred of support that they may have had before.

Expand full comment
Joanne Kaufman's avatar

Spoken like a true Jew hater. Or do you consider that a compliment.

Expand full comment
Liora Jacob's avatar

Joanne note the video he posted. All of unfounded claims - only injured and dead bodies shown, whom we now know were killed by Hamas to discredit the GHF sites and smear Jews. As I suspected, not a single unedited, non-AI video exists of Israeli soldiers in Gaza deliberately killing unarmed civilians who are trying to get aid from the GHF.

Oh, and look at the hundreds of men in the video - not a single one even remotely malnourished.

So much for ā€œfamineā€.

Expand full comment
Joanne Kaufman's avatar

Liora, thank you for doing the work for me. I am mentally spent, responding to the lies, distortions, misperceptions, and denials, personally and online. Many of these posters reveal confirmation bias, cherry-picking media reports and historical publications that support their inversions of reality. I've gotten to the point of responding to people who are uninformed, curious, and/or open to factual explanations.

Expand full comment
Liora Jacob's avatar

ā€œThe Holocaust/Oct 7 didn’t happen and the Jews/ Zionists deserved it!ā€

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

What? Read a newspaper, read a book, watch any one of the many documentaries. Both those things happened. What also has happened is the murders of 10s of thousands of Palestinians this year alone, let alone the previous 7 decades.

You need to educate yourself I think.

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

Not once did I mention Jews, that's been you, not me. You. I do not hate Jews, I hate Zionist Israelis. Why are you bringing up Judaism? I guess you'll be bringing out the old "antisemitic" trope next?

Expand full comment
Liora Jacob's avatar

Pat Johnson, substack:

ā€œIsrael is not viewed by progressive activists as the world’s embodiment of evil because of settlements or policies or any of the other red herrings that are thrown up to justify the hysterical condemnations. It is viewed as the embodiment of evil because Jews have traditionally been the empty vessel upon which humans have projected their sins — and the Jewish state is both the national embodiment of the Jewish people and the natural inheritor of centuries of projection and vilification of Jews.

Jews worldwide are not targeted because of Israel’s existence. On the contrary, Israel is targeted because of Jews’ existence. At a minimum, it is the Jewish people’s insistence on existing as a self-determined people that sets off the haters.

It is not, fundamentally, the existence or actions of Israel that lead to global condemnations and acts of hate against Jews around the world. No, we’ve got this exactly backward. It is the hatred of Jews around the world that leads to the military and rhetorical assaults against Israel. Global antisemitism is not a byproduct of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a byproduct of global antisemitism.ā€

Thanks for proving his point so perfectly.

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

Which part of the Guardian article is untrue Joanne?

Expand full comment